PAYMENT REQUEST
DEPARTMENT | PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION |
---|---|
FUND | GCP-TRANSPORTATION P1/2006 |
PROGRAM | 2006 P1 - $103.1M PARENT |
ACTIVITY | STREET RECONSTRUCTION - $85M |
EXPENSE CATEGORY | SERVICES-TESTING |
PAYEE | TERRACON CONSULTANTS INC |
PAYMENT REQUEST | Select a payment request. |
PAYMENT REQUEST | DESCRIPTION | CHECK DATE | CHECK STATUS Checks cleared as of 01/31/2015 have been reflected as paid on the reports |
AMOUNT |
---|---|---|---|---|
PRM 6100 10072631691 | GEOTECHNICAL - SOILS | 07/27/2010 | Paid | $3,705.00 |
PRM 6000 10022315072 | GEOTECHNICAL - SOILS | 02/24/2010 | Paid | $3,301.30 |
PRM 6000 10021914754 | GEOTECHNICAL - SOILS | 02/22/2010 | Paid | $613.20 |
PRM 6000 10011210672 | GEOTECHNICAL - SOILS | 01/13/2010 | Paid | $2,167.20 |
PRM 6000 09110504201 | GEOTECHNICAL - SOILS | 11/06/2009 | Paid | $2,733.40 |
PRM 6000 09090342681 | GEOTECHNICAL - SOILS | 09/04/2009 | Paid | $2,648.40 |
PRM 6000 09082741905 | GEOTECHNICAL - SOILS | 08/28/2009 | Paid | $1,539.60 |
PRM 6000 09081039600 | GEOTECHNICAL - SOILS | 08/11/2009 | Paid | $546.00 |
PRM 6000 09051429581 | GEOTECHNICAL - SOILS | 05/15/2009 | Paid | $1,982.40 |
PRM 6000 09041425791 | GEOTECHNICAL - SOILS | 04/15/2009 | Paid | $1,705.20 |
PRM 6000 09031621777 | GEOTECHNICAL - SOILS | 03/17/2009 | Paid | $2,662.90 |
PRM 6000 09030920782 | GEOTECHNICAL - SOILS | 03/10/2009 | Paid | $3,015.80 |
PRM 6000 09022719587 | GEOTECHNICAL - SOILS | 03/02/2009 | Paid | $2,560.00 |
PRM 6000 09021317967 | GEOTECHNICAL - SOILS | 02/17/2009 | Paid | $1,339.80 |
PRM 6000 08112407722 | GEOTECHNICAL - SOILS | 11/25/2008 | Paid | $2,106.50 |
PRM 6000 08103004449 | GEOTECHNICAL - SOILS | 10/31/2008 | Paid | $1,104.60 |
PRM 6000 08102303515 | GEOTECHNICAL - SOILS | 10/24/2008 | Paid | $2,923.80 |
The data contained on this website is for informational purposes only and contains expenditure information for the City of Austin. Certain Austin Energy transactions have been excluded as competitive matters under Texas Government Code Section 552.133 and City Council Resolution 20051201-002; therefore, the line amounts may not reflect the total check amount if certain Austin Energy invoices were included on the check.